Skip Navigation or Skip to Content

Black Homes Matter: The Fate of Affordable Housing in Pittsburgh

“I live here. I’m from here. My whole family is here. We try to stay close together. This is America. I’m a Marine, I went to war three times. I served my country. It feels crazy not to be able to live in my own area where I grew up,” writes an East Liberty resident in Black Homes Matter, a booklet describing alternative approaches to neighborhood revitalization in the city of Pittsburgh. Since the Reagan-era shutdown of funding for public housing projects, the lack of decent affordable housing for low-income people has become a crisis in many cities. San Francisco and Seattle are notorious for pushing out poor and working-class residents, but mid-sized cities like Pittsburgh will be following suit unless city governments have the courage to implement equitable development.

Pittsburgh has been designated the “most livable city” in the US several times in the past decade. It gets points for its parks and rivers, excellent universities and hospitals, low crime rate, strong family centered neighborhoods, expanding high-tech economy, and fine dining. Of course, The Economist and Forbes magazine do not consider how the city’s livability is distributed unequally across lines of race and class. The facts that we have among the steepest bus fares in the nation, the lowest minimum wages, and high infant mortality among African Americans do not figure in rankings designed to attract tourists and new businesses to the city.

Remaking East Liberty: Eastside III Annie Place rendering by Design Collective. (Image via The Architect’s Newspaper)

Housing is one of the sharpest of these class-race fault lines, as gentrification accelerates in desirable neighborhoods. In a city already segregated by race, affordable housing is rapidly being replaced by high-end units for young professionals attracted by the city’s hi-tech reinvention of itself after the decline of steel and other industries. The former Nabisco factory in East Liberty now houses a Google hub in the Bakery Square mall and “village,” with an LA Fitness, Anthropologie, and high-priced coffee shops. Its developer received major public funding because the project borders a “blighted” neighborhood, whose mostly black residents have hardly benefited from the action. Few local residents are employed by the new businesses in their neighborhood.

East Liberty is also the site of a nearly completed Transit-Oriented Development project along the Port Authority’s Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway. Residents of the 360 new apartments, built by private developers with infrastructure provided by the city, will be able to get downtown in 12 minutes. Rents in the transit center buildings start at $1,100 a month for a studio apartment. No units have been reserved for tenants whose income is below the city’s median income, which in Pittsburgh is $37,161 overall, and $21,790 for black residents. Calculating housing expenses at 30% of income, maximum rents would be $929 and $545 respectively. In the absence of inclusionary zoning, or other enforcement for equity, there is no room in the attractive new development for even the average city resident, let alone those getting by on much lower incomes. Ironically, these are the residents who traditionally rely on public transit. Pittsburgh is on a course to follow Washington DC, where a recent Washington Post study found that neighborhoods with Metro stops are now majority white, and “the Metrorail system is becoming more inaccessible to minority workers.”

Remaking East Liberty: The Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway is the developmental centerpiece in this rendering of Eastside III by Design Collective. (Image via The Architect’s Newspaper)

Throughout what was a predominantly black neighborhood, residents are being forced out either through direct eviction from public housing that is being demolished for redevelopment or because rents have risen beyond their means. In the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Diana Nelson Jones writes, “Many who are leaving East Liberty can’t find rental housing under $800. Many are having to accept living without adequate services, including transit, outside city neighborhoods where they have earned a sense of belonging. The vast majority are our elders, lifelong laborers and the working poor. Nobody should get sick with stress in the struggle to pay their expenses, then get sent off to the fringes.” But that is the current reality. One resident quoted in Black Homes Matter says, “We wasted six months looking for something affordable around here so we finally moved out to Millvale. I had to buy a car to commute back here to my job and then I had to take another job to pay for the car. I get very little sleep. And I miss my neighborhood.”

As a white middle-class resident of a neighborhood bordering East Liberty, I have benefited from the area’s revitalization. I shop at Trader Joe’s and Home Depot and eat at Chipotle and Whole Foods. I have a choice of three nearby yoga studios. The house I bought 20 years ago for $50,000 with help from the Urban Redevelopment Authority because it was in a “transitional” neighborhood, is now worth upwards of $300,000.  My street, which was mixed-race back then, now appears to be entirely white, despite being majority rental. There’s a deep injustice in the fact that many residents who lived through the period of “blight” in the neighborhood are not here to share in its renewal or in the wealth being generated. Some residents who stay no longer feel at home. “There are people looking at me like ‘What are you doing here?’ I had my first kiss on that street. I had to get stitches over there,” says one resident quoted in Black Homes Matter.

Charles “Teenie” Harris, Penn Avenue in East Liberty with Carl’s Bar and Lounge on right, buildings being demolished on left, Liberty Theater in background and billboards for Tris Anne fruits and nuts and Esso gasoline, and man wearing plaid shirt standing in street, ca. 1965–1975. Carnegie Museum of Art, Heinz Family Fund.

Along with its “most livable” designation, Pittsburgh is also credited these days for its progressive city administration. Mayor Bill Peduto, in office since 2014, is listed alongside New York’s Bill De Blasio as a leader willing to tackle structural inequality in his city. Bakery Square and the East Liberty transit-oriented development were initiated before Peduto’s term, and he has recently set up an Affordable Housing Task Force. A test case will come with the development of the “28 acres,” a vast parking lot in the largely black Lower Hill. This was the site in the 1960s of one of Pittsburgh’s most brutal acts of “urban renewal”—or “negro removal” as activists call it. Eight thousand people were displaced and their homes and businesses razed to make way for an arena and parking for the Pittsburgh Penguins hockey team. The arena has been demolished and the Penguins have relocated, but they still own the land and they refuse to include more than 20% of affordable housing on the site. With “affordable” defined as 80% of the market rate, even those few homes will be out of reach for descendants of the families that used to live in what was a thriving community.

An aerial view of Bjarke Ingels Group’s proposal for developing the Lower Hill and site of the former Civic Arena. (Image via Bjarke Ingels Group)

It doesn’t have to be this way. On Pittsburgh’s North Side there is a counterexample: a strong tenant council prevented the eviction of more than 300 low-income families from Section 8 housing slated for redevelopment. Working with the URA and other agencies, the tenant council—Northside Coalition for Fair Housing—acquired a majority interest in the company that owns and manages the properties, thereby keeping people in their homes. “The result has been higher-quality housing, safer and more attractive neighborhoods, and increased tenant incomes,” according to the Pittsburgh Fair Development Action Group, which produced Black Homes Matter. The group advocates a range of strategies to resist displacement and support resident control in neighborhoods threatened by gentrification: inclusionary zoning, community land trusts, rent stabilization, tenant ownership schemes.

There is no shortage of successful models from around the country. In Pittsburgh and other cities, we need the political will to hold private property developers accountable to equitable standards and to include residents in determining plans for improvement of their communities.  Affordable housing and accessible transit are essential to neighborhoods that are “livable” for all.

This essay was published in partnership with the Working-Class Perspectives blog, which offers weekly commentaries on current issues related to working-class people and communities. In a series of salons starting Thursday, February 18, the public is invited to engage in discussions concerning the highs and lows of Pittsburgh’s postwar redevelopment as well as its current renaissance. To learn more about this period of sweeping change in the city’s history, visit the Pittsburgh Modern story archive. Image credit (top): East Liberty Transit Center Aerial Rendering by Studio for Spatial Practice. (Image via The Architect’s Newspaper)

The exhibition HACLab Pittsburgh: Imagining the Modern is on view at Carnegie Museum of Art from September 12, 2015 to May 2, 2016.

  • John Moyer

    Hear! Hear!

  • Timothy Reardon

    ” Few local residents are employed by the new businesses in their neighborhood.”
    This is an important and powerful assertion. What data are available to validate this statement?

    • Nicholas Coles

      Good question, Timothy. According to the Black Homes Matter pamphlet I cite in the blog, “Only 1.6% of all jobs in East Liberty are held by residents of East Liberty.” I didn’t cite this figure because a) I wasn’t sure how East Liberty was being defined (to include Larimer / Bakery Square or not), and b) it seemed so low, I couldn’t quite credit it. But I agree it’s important and I want to track down the data — which I’ll share if I’m successful. NC

  • joshuavincent

    This is been a slow-motion crisis building for years in Pittsburgh. Neighborhood such as Homewood, and the Hill District were solid neighborhoods of working African-American families who had a plethora of affordable housing thanks to Pittsburgh’s use of the land value tax, which reduced the incidence of the property tax on these vulnerable neighborhoods during the collapse of the steel industry.

    In the year 2000, in the middle of a corrosive mayoral primary an opportunistic challenger took advantage of a controversial reassessment and the anger of upper-middle-class residents to end the 80-year-old land value tax. The change back to traditional property taxation very quickly reduced building renovations and construction starts just as the growth boom of the 2000 started, increased taxes in poor to working neighborhoods, as well as reduced real property tax collections overall.

    Pittsburgh may be turning into a playground for tax abatement-hungry developers and millennials, but what used to be a community that could comfortably and affordably contain residents and businesses, rich and poor, and black-and-white is turning into another monoculture. There could’ve been a different way.

  • This is a terrific overview, and I’m glad you mention an example of the Northside Coalition for Fair Housing, which you mention “acquired properties and used a “rehab for resale” strategy to keep people in their homes.”

    Your later statement, “There is no shortage of successful models from around the country.” may be true, but needs better publicity. Many articles on gentrification paint gentrifiers and developers as evil-doers without providing concrete, realistic examples of how to redevelop humanely. I’m not hearing enough of these stories in the press.

    • Nicholas Coles

      Thanks for your comment! I too hear about gentrification as a steam-roller that can’t be stopped, or diverted. For a great list of alternatives in practice in other cities, I recommend the pamphlet I cite in the blog. Black Homes Matter breaks these down into: “Residential Non-Displacement Strategies,” “Business Non-Displacement Strategies,” “Strategies to Increase Access to Opportunity / Income,” “Strategies to Support Resident Ownership of Community Assets.” The link is in the blog above. NC

  • Pingback: Spring Break Links 2016 | The Hyperarchival Parallax()

  • Sheila She

    What a great article, and I do agree that we need to demand better methods of redevelopment. Neighborhoods and their residents deserve protecting…no matter how much money they have. And schools should be federally funded evenly, across the broad.

  • Pingback: The Spaces of Gentrification and August Wilson | Brianne Jaquette()

  • Pingback: Pittsburgh: The disappearing Black community and land value – Georgism()

  • Amy J

    Sorry to bust the bubble but, this is not a race thing. Blacks are not the only one struggling on the lower end of the income scale, finding it hard to get employment and worrying about how to find affordable housing before it sky rockets and there really is no chance.